The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists — Inside the Classic

(1 User reviews)   302
Tressell, Robert, 1870-1911 Project Gutenberg 2003 Not confirmed
Working class -- Fiction; England -- Fiction; Political fiction; Social classes -- Fiction; Capitalism -- Fiction; Socialists -- Fiction; Working class families -- Fiction; Labor movement -- Fiction; Social conflict -- Fiction Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 260,260
Reading time 1132 min
Text sections 61

The source record for The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists — Inside the Classic measures this digital text at 260,260 words, 18 hr 52 min estimated reading time, and 61 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Working class -- Fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Robert Tressell's novel uses sharp dialogue and detailed description to expose the exploitation of building workers in early 20th-century England, focusing on the cynical maneuvers of employers and the resigned acceptance of the laborers.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

nt I have succeeded is for others to say; but whatever their verdict, the work possesses at least one merit—that of being true. I have invented nothing. There are no scenes or incidents in the story that I have not either witnessed myself or had conclusive evidence of. As far as I dared I let the characters express themselves in their own sort of language and consequently some passages may be considered objectionable. At the same time I believe that—because it is true—the book is not without its humorous side.

The scenes and characters are typical of every town in the South of England and they will be readily recognized by those concerned. If the book is published I think it will appeal to a very large number of readers. Because it is true it will probably be denounced as a libel on the working classes and their employers, and upon the religious-professing section of the community. But I believe it will be acknowledged as true by most of those who are compelled to spend their lives amid the surroundings it describes, and it will be evident that no attack is made upon sincere religion.

Chapter 1 An Imperial Banquet. A Philosophical Discussion. The Mysterious Stranger. Britons Never shall be Slaves

The house was named “The Cave”. It was a large old-fashioned three-storied building standing in about an acre of ground, and situated about a mile outside the town of Mugsborough. It stood back nearly two hundred yards from the main road and was reached by means of a by-road or lane, on each side of which was a hedge formed of hawthorn trees and blackberry bushes. This house had been unoccupied for many years and it was now being altered and renovated for its new owner by the firm of Rushton & Co., Builders and Decorators.

There were, altogether, about twenty-five men working there, carpenters, plumbers, plasterers, bricklayers and painters, besides several unskilled labourers. New floors were being put in where the old ones were decayed, and upstairs two of the rooms were being made into one by demolishing the parting wall and substituting an iron girder. Some of the window frames and sashes were so rotten that they were being replaced. Some of the ceilings and walls were so cracked and broken that they had to be replastered. Openings were cut through walls and doors were being put where no doors had been before. Old broken chimney pots were being taken down and new ones were being taken up and fixed in their places. All the old whitewash had to be washed off the ceilings and all the old paper had to be scraped off the walls preparatory to the house being repainted and decorated. The air was full of the sounds of hammering and sawing, the ringing of trowels, the rattle of pails, the splashing of water brushes, and the scraping of the stripping knives used by those who were removing the old wallpaper. Besides being full of these the air was heavily laden with dust and disease germs, powdered mortar, lime, plaster, and the dirt that had been accumulating within the old house for years. In brief, those employed there might be said to be living in a Tariff Reform Paradise—they had Plenty of Work.

At twelve o’clock Bob Crass—the painters’ foreman—blew a blast upon a whistle and all hands assembled in the kitchen, where Bert the apprentice had already prepared the tea, which was ready in the large galvanized iron pail that he had placed in the middle of the floor. By the side of the pail were a number of old jam-jars, mugs, dilapidated tea-cups and one or two empty condensed milk tins. Each man on the “job” paid Bert threepence a week for the tea and sugar—they did not have milk—and although they had tea at breakfast-time as well as at dinner, the lad was generally considered to be making a fortune.

Two pairs of steps, laid parallel on their sides at a distance of about eight feet from each other, with a plank laid across, in front of the fire, several upturned pails, and the drawers belonging to the dresser, formed the seating accommodation. The floor of the room was covered with all manner of debris, dust, dirt, fragments of old mortar and plaster. A sack containing cement was leaning against one of the walls, and a bucket containing some stale whitewash stood in one corner.

As each man came in he filled his cup, jam-jar or condensed milk tin with tea from the steaming pail, before sitting down. Most of them brought their food in little wicker baskets which they held on their laps or placed on the floor beside them.

At first there was no attempt at conversation and nothing was heard but the sounds of eating and drinking and the drizzling of the bloater which Easton, one of the painters, was toasting on the end of a pointed stick at the fire.

“I don’t think much of this bloody tea,” suddenly remarked Sawkins, one of the labourers.

“Well it oughter be all right,” retorted Bert; “it’s been bilin’ ever since ’arf past eleven.”

Bert White was a frail-looking, weedy, pale-faced boy, fifteen years of age and about four feet nine inches in height. His trousers were part of a suit that he had once worn for best, but that was so long ago that they had become too small for him, fitting rather tightly and scarcely reaching the top of his patched and broken hob-nailed boots. The knees and the bottoms of the legs of his trousers had been patched with square pieces of cloth, several shades darker than the original fabric, and these patches were now all in rags. His coat was several sizes too large for him and hung about him like a dirty ragged sack. He was a pitiable spectacle of neglect and wretchedness as he sat there on an upturned pail, eating his bread and cheese with fingers that, like his clothing, were grimed with paint and dirt.

“Well then, you can’t have put enough tea in, or else you’ve bin usin’ up wot was left yesterday,” continued Sawkins.

“Why the bloody ’ell don’t you leave the boy alone?” said Harlow, another painter. “If you don’t like the tea you needn’t drink it. For my part, I’m sick of listening to you about it every damn day.”

“It’s all very well for you to say I needn’t drink it,” answered Sawkins, “but I’ve paid my share an’ I’ve got a right to express an opinion. It’s my belief that ’arf the money we gives him is spent on penny ’orribles: ’e’s always got one in ’is hand, an’ to make wot tea ’e does buy last, ’e collects all the slops wot’s left and biles it up day after day.”

“No, I don’t!” said Bert, who was on the verge of tears. “It’s not me wot buys the things at all. I gives the money I gets to Crass, and ’e buys them ’imself, so there!”

At this revelation, some of the men furtively exchanged significant glances, and Crass, the foreman, became very red.

“You’d better keep your bloody thruppence and make your own tea after this week,” he said, addressing Sawkins, “and then p’raps we’ll ’ave a little peace at meal-times.”

“An’ you needn’t ask me to cook no bloaters or bacon for you no more,” added Bert, tearfully, ’cos I won’t do it.”

Sawkins was not popular with any of the others. When, about twelve months previously, he first came to work for Rushton & Co., he was a simple labourer, but since then he had “picked up” a slight knowledge of the trade, and having armed himself with a putty-knife and put on a white jacket, regarded himself as a fully qualified painter. The others did not perhaps object to him trying to better his condition, but his wages—fivepence an hour—were twopence an hour less than the standard rate, and the result was that in slack times often a better workman was “stood off” when Sawkins was kept on. Moreover, he was generally regarded as a sneak who carried tales to the foreman and the “Bloke”. Every new hand who was taken on was usually warned by his new mates “not to let the b—r Sawkins see anything.”

The unpleasant silence which now ensued was at length broken by one of the men, who told a dirty story, and in the laughter and applause that followed, the incident of the tea was forgotten.

“How did you get on yesterday?” asked Crass, addressing Bundy, the plasterer, who was intently studying the sporting columns of the _Daily Obscurer_.

“No luck,” replied Bundy, gloomily. “I had a bob each way on Stockwell, in the first race, but it was scratched before the start.”

This gave rise to a conversation between Crass, Bundy, and one or two others concerning the chances of different horses in the morrow’s races. It was Friday, and no one had much money, so at the suggestion of Bundy, a Syndicate was formed, each member contributing threepence for the purpose of backing a dead certainty given by the renowned Captain Kiddem of the _Obscurer_. One of those who did not join the syndicate was Frank Owen, who was as usual absorbed in a newspaper. He was generally regarded as a bit of a crank: for it was felt that there must be something wrong about a man who took no interest in racing or football and was always talking a lot of rot about religion and politics. If it had not been for the fact that he was generally admitted to be an exceptionally good workman, they would have had little hesitation about thinking that he was mad. This man was about thirty-two years of age, and of medium height, but so slightly built that he appeared taller. There was a suggestion of refinement in his clean-shaven face, but his complexion was ominously clear, and an unnatural colour flushed the think cheeks.

There was a certain amount of justification for the attitude of his fellow workmen, for Owen held the most unusual and unorthodox opinions on the subjects mentioned.

The affairs of the world are ordered in accordance with orthodox opinions. If anyone did not think in accordance with these he soon discovered this fact for himself. Owen saw that in the world a small class of people were possessed of a great abundance and superfluity of the things that are produced by work. He saw also that a very great number—in fact the majority of the people—lived on the verge of want; and that a smaller but still very large number lived lives of semi-starvation from the cradle to the grave; while a yet smaller but still very great number actually died of hunger, or, maddened by privation, killed themselves and their children in order to put a period to their misery. And strangest of all—in his opinion—he saw that people who enjoyed abundance of the things that are made by work, were the people who did Nothing: and that the others, who lived in want or died of hunger, were the people who worked. And seeing all this he thought that it was wrong, that the system that produced such results was rotten and should be altered. And he had sought out and eagerly read the writings of those who thought they knew how it might be done.

It was because he was in the habit of speaking of these subjects that his fellow workmen came to the conclusion that there was probably something wrong with his mind.

When all the members of the syndicate had handed over their contributions, Bundy went out to arrange matters with the bookie, and when he had gone Easton annexed the copy of the _Obscurer_ that Bundy had thrown away, and proceeded to laboriously work through some carefully cooked statistics relating to Free Trade and Protection. Bert, his eyes starting out of his head and his mouth wide open, was devouring the contents of a paper called _The Chronicles of Crime_. Ned Dawson, a poor devil who was paid fourpence an hour for acting as mate or labourer to Bundy, or the bricklayers, or anyone else who wanted him, lay down on the dirty floor in a corner of the room and with his coat rolled up as a pillow, went to sleep. Sawkins, with the same intention, stretched himself at full length on the dresser. Another who took no part in the syndicate was Barrington, a labourer, who, having finished his dinner, placed the cup he brought for his tea back into his dinner basket, took out an old briar pipe which he slowly filled, and proceeded to smoke in silence.

Some time previously the firm had done some work for a wealthy gentleman who lived in the country, some distance outside Mugsborough. This gentleman also owned some property in the town and it was commonly reported that he had used his influence with Rushton to induce the latter to give Barrington employment. It was whispered amongst the hands that the young man was a distant relative of the gentleman’s, and that he had disgraced himself in some way and been disowned by his people. Rushton was supposed to have given him a job in the hope of currying favour with his wealthy client, from whom he hoped to obtain more work. Whatever the explanation of the mystery may have been, the fact remained that Barrington, who knew nothing of the work except what he had learned since he had been taken on, was employed as a painter’s labourer at the usual wages—fivepence per hour.

He was about twenty-five years of age and a good deal taller than the majority of the others, being about five feet ten inches in height and slenderly though well and strongly built. He seemed very anxious to learn all that he could about the trade, and although rather reserved in his manner, he had contrived to make himself fairly popular with his workmates. He seldom spoke unless to answer when addressed, and it was difficult to draw him into conversation. At meal-times, as on the present occasion, he generally smoked, apparently lost in thought and unconscious of his surroundings.

Most of the others also lit their pipes and a desultory conversation ensued.

“Is the gent what’s bought this ’ouse any relation to Sweater the draper?” asked Payne, the carpenter’s foreman.

“It’s the same bloke,” replied Crass.

“Didn’t he used to be on the Town Council or something?”

“’E’s bin on the Council for years,” returned Crass. “’E’s on it now. ’E’s mayor this year. ’E’s bin mayor several times before.”

“Let’s see,” said Payne, reflectively, “’e married old Grinder’s sister, didn’t ’e? You know who I mean, Grinder the greengrocer.”

“Yes, I believe he did,” said Crass.

“It wasn’t Grinder’s sister,” chimed in old Jack Linden. “It was ’is niece. I know, because I remember working in their ’ouse just after they was married, about ten year ago.”

“Oh yes, I remember now,” said Payne. “She used to manage one of Grinder’s branch shops didn’t she?”

“Yes,” replied Linden. “I remember it very well because there was a lot of talk about it at the time. By all accounts, ole Sweater used to be a regler ’ot un: no one never thought as he’d ever git married at all: there was some funny yarns about several young women what used to work for him.”

This important matter being disposed of, there followed a brief silence, which was presently broken by Harlow.

“Funny name to call a ’ouse, ain’t it?” he said. “‘The Cave.’ I wonder what made ’em give it a name like that.”

“They calls ’em all sorts of outlandish names nowadays,” said old Jack Linden.

“There’s generally some sort of meaning to it, though,” observed Payne. “For instance, if a bloke backed a winner and made a pile, ’e might call ’is ’ouse, ‘Epsom Lodge’ or ‘Newmarket Villa’.”

“Or sometimes there’s a hoak tree or a cherry tree in the garding,” said another man; “then they calls it ‘Hoak Lodge’ or ‘Cherry Cottage’.”

“Well, there’s a cave up at the end of this garden,” said Harlow with a grin, “you know, the cesspool, what the drains of the ’ouse runs into; praps they called it after that.”

“Talking about the drains,” said old Jack Linden when the laughter produced by this elegant joke had ceased. “Talking about the drains, I wonder what they’re going to do about them; the ’ouse ain’t fit to live in as they are now, and as for that bloody cesspool it ought to be done away with.”

“So it is going to be,” replied Crass. “There’s going to be a new set of drains altogether, carried right out to the road and connected with the main.”

Crass really knew no more about what was going to be done in this matter than did Linden, but he felt certain that this course would be adopted. He never missed an opportunity of enhancing his own prestige with the men by insinuating that he was in the confidence of the firm.

“That’s goin’ to cost a good bit,” said Linden.

“Yes, I suppose it will,” replied Crass, “but money ain’t no object to old Sweater. ’E’s got tons of it; you know ’e’s got a large wholesale business in London and shops all over the bloody country, besides the one ’e’s got ’ere.”

Easton was still reading the Obscurer; he was not about to understand exactly what the compiler of the figures was driving at—probably the latter never intended that anyone should understand—but he was conscious of a growing feeling of indignation and hatred against foreigners of every description, who were ruining this country, and he began to think that it was about time we did something to protect ourselves. Still, it was a very difficult question: to tell the truth, he himself could not make head or tail of it. At length he said aloud, addressing himself to Crass:

“Wot do you think of this ’ere fissical policy, Bob?”

“Ain’t thought much about it,” replied Crass. “I don’t never worry my ’ed about politics.”

“Much better left alone,” chimed in old Jack Linden sagely, “argyfying about politics generally ends up with a bloody row an’ does no good to nobody.”

At this there was a murmur of approval from several of the others. Most of them were averse from arguing or disputing about politics. If two or three men of similar opinions happened to be together they might discuss such things in a friendly and superficial way, but in a mixed company it was better left alone. The “Fissical Policy” emanated from the Tory party. That was the reason why some of them were strongly in favour of it, and for the same reason others were opposed to it. Some of them were under the delusion that they were Conservatives: similarly, others imagined themselves to be Liberals. As a matter of fact, most of them were nothing. They knew as much about the public affairs of their own country as they did of the condition of affairs in the planet of Jupiter.

Easton began to regret that he had broached so objectionable a subject, when, looking up from his paper, Owen said:

“Does the fact that you never ‘trouble your heads about politics’ prevent you from voting at election times?”

No one answered, and there ensued a brief silence. Easton however, in spite of the snub he had received, could not refrain from talking.

“Well, I don’t go in for politics much, either, but if what’s in this ’ere paper is true, it seems to me as we oughter take some interest in it, when the country is being ruined by foreigners.”

“If you’re going to believe all that’s in that bloody rag you’ll want some salt,” said Harlow.

The Obscurer was a Tory paper and Harlow was a member of the local Liberal club. Harlow’s remark roused Crass.

Robert Tressell's The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists opens with a scene of working men discussing their plight, their speech laced with irony and bitterness. The novel's title itself is a sardonic label for workers who, in Tressell's view, donate their labor to enrich their employers. The excerpt from the preface states the author's intention to present a 'faithful picture of working-class life' and to expose the 'futility of the measures taken' to address poverty. Tressell's narrative method relies heavily on extended dialogue and detailed descriptions of work processes, as seen in the lengthy conversation among the 'brigands'—the employers—who plot to manipulate a town council into buying their electric light company at an inflated price.

The Brigands' Language of Deception

The dialogue among the employers—Sweater, Grinder, Rushton, and Didlum—reveals a calculated cynicism. They speak of 'bragging about what a good thing we've got' and arranging for 'letters sent to the Editor' under pseudonyms like 'Progress' or 'Ratepayer'. Their language is laced with self-congratulation: 'one of the smartest thing we've ever done'. Tressell uses their colloquial, ungrammatical speech ('harticles', 'honly') to underscore their lack of refinement despite their wealth. The repetition of 'we' and 'our' emphasizes their collusion, while phrases like 'put THEM in a fog' show their contempt for the public. This dialogue is not merely exposition; it is a dramatization of how power operates through language—through fake consensus, manufactured consent, and the dismissal of opposition as a 'nine days' wonder'.

The Work of Description: Labor as Spectacle

Tressell's descriptive passages often focus on the physical details of work, from the 'installation of the works' to the 'filling of the tank' (a chapter title). In the excerpt, the employers discuss 'the initial expenses and difficulties' of the electric light works, but the actual labor of installing and maintaining such systems is absent from their calculations. The novel elsewhere provides meticulous accounts of painting, plastering, and other trades, but even in this scene, the reader senses the gap between the abstract financial scheming and the concrete toil of the workers. The author's choice to render the employers' planning in such granular detail—down to the fake letters and the 'expert engineer' to be bribed—makes the machinery of exploitation visible. The reader is invited to see how decisions affecting workers' lives are made in back rooms, far from the job site.

Irony and the Reader's Position

The narrative voice in this passage is notably flat, reporting the brigands' words without overt commentary. The irony emerges from the contrast between their self-satisfaction and the reader's awareness of the harm they cause. When Grinder says, 'If we can honly git away with it, I reckon it'll be one of the smartest thing we've ever done,' the misspelling of 'only' and 'smartest' (as 'honly' and 'smartest') may signal the author's satirical intent. Tressell does not need to editorialize; the characters condemn themselves through their own words. This technique places the reader in a position of judgment, forced to recognize the gap between the brigands' view of themselves as clever businessmen and the reality of their predatory behavior. The chapter titles—'The Brigands at Work', 'The Great Money Trick'—further cue the reader to interpret the events as a kind of performance or game, with the workers as the unwitting audience.

Structure and the Accumulation of Evidence

The excerpt is part of a longer sequence in which the employers' conspiracy is laid out in detail. Tressell structures the novel as a series of episodes, each building a case against the capitalist system. The chapter titles—'The Financiers', 'The Placard', 'The Exterminating Machines'—suggest a methodical exposure of different facets of exploitation. In this passage, the dialogue moves from a specific scheme (buying the electric light works) to a general principle: 'we must be careful not to overdo it' with publicity. The effect is cumulative; the reader sees not just one corrupt deal but a pattern of behavior. Tressell's choice to present the employers' plotting at length, without interruption, mirrors the way such schemes unfold in reality—through sustained, unglamorous conversation. The lack of any worker perspective in this section underscores the asymmetry of power: the decisions that affect the 'ragged trousered philanthropists' are made without their knowledge or input.

Readers attentive to Tressell's use of dialogue will notice how the characters' speech patterns—the bosses' smug colloquialisms, the workers' weary acquiescence—carry much of the novel's argument. The author's decision to let the brigands speak at length, without authorial interruption, forces the reader to confront the banality of corruption. As you read, consider how Tressell balances satire with documentary detail, and how the novel's structure—alternating between the boardroom and the building site—creates a comprehensive picture of class relations in Edwardian England.

Sometimes, reading Tressell’s weary workmen trudging through their pointless, painted labors, I felt a strange echo of another world entirely—of quiet country rooms and inherited duty. There’s a certain resignation in both, a weight of expectation. I thought of The Heir of Redclyffe — Inside the Classic, and how that young man, too, carried a burden he never chose, though his was of honor, not of plaster. Such different sorrows.

Mila Garcia
1 month ago

3
3 out of 5 (1 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
  • ...
    Evelyn Cunningham - 1 month ago
    {'review_type': 'negative', 'content': "While the socialist polemic is admirable, the novel suffers from didacticism and a lack of subtlety. The characters often feel like mouthpieces for the author's views, and the plot is secondary to the political message. The prose can be dry and repetitive. A more balanced approach would have made it a stronger literary work."}

  • ...
    Kimberly Solomon - 2 weeks ago
    {'review_type': 'positive', 'content': "A powerful and unflinching critique of capitalism and social injustice. The author's portrayal of the workers' struggles is both vivid and thought-provoking, blending satire with stark realism. The characters are memorable, and the narrative drives home the dehumanizing effects of greed. An essential read that remains startlingly relevant today."}

  • ...
    Eric Stewart - 1 week ago
    {'review_type': 'neutral', 'content': 'This novel offers a compelling look at labor issues with sharp social commentary. However, the pacing is inconsistent, with lengthy political diatribes interrupting the story. Still, the central message is powerful, and the character interactions provide plenty of insight. A classic worth exploring for its historical significance.'}


Reader reflection

Your personal reading reflection

Build a private reading journal entry for this title.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Which reading stage best describes you?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

How easy was the book to follow?

Related eBooks